11 November, 2019 15:53

Over & over & over again facebook harrasses me asking me to fill in an invisible code I can not see & this is the way they are censoring me now & not allowing me to post a comment on a news story. Mark Zuckerburg is an evil facist totalian cyber world government dictator.

FACEBOOK IS CENSORING ME! REPORT THIS TO THE WHITE HOUSE!

Facebook is repeatedly censoring my comment. PLEASE ALERT WHITE HOUSE TO THIS FACIST, TOTALITARIAN CENSORSHIP BY CYBER DICTATOR MARK ZUCKERBURG!

FACEBOOK REMOVED THIS COMMENT OF MINE.
FACEBOOK NOTIFIES ME: “IF YOU THINK THIS
DOESN’T GO AGAINST OUR COMMUNITY STANDARDS
LET US KNOW”
I let them know, but they refuse to respond,
and continue to remove this comment when
I re-post it.
HOW DOES THIS VIOLATE FACIST, DICTATOR,
TOTALITARIAN MARK ZUCKERBERG’S STANDARDS?

CRIS ERICSON
“R.O.I. return on investment, for every taxpayer dollar the U.S. Congress votes to give the N.I.H. and Pentagon, they turn around and disperse those funds for medical and defense research, and the pharmaceutical and defense industry co.s make huge profits, but WE paid for the R&D, the research, design and development of new prescription drugs and jets and defense products, so when they are sold worldwide, WE should receive a share of the profits, R.O.I. return on investment, like stock dividends.”

Please notify the White House that facebook
is a totalitarian, facist, world wide cyber
dictatorship and Mark Zuckerburg is the
number one enemy of Democracy and free speech.

President Trump has 6th Amendment rights! Demand the US Constitution be upheld!

President Trump has 6th Amendment rights like all of us!
Demand his US Constitutional rights be upheld!

Many people in criminal courts these days are
deprived of their 6th Amendment rights,
and if everyone knew what really goes on,
they would be shocked and horrified the
way people like Adam Schiff and Nancy Pelosi
are working to destroy the U.S. Constitution!

Constitution of the United States
6th Amendment
In all criminal prosecutions,
the accused shall enjoy the right
to a speedy
and public trial,
by an impartial jury
of the State and district wherein
the crime shall have been committed,
which district shall have been
previously ascertained by law,
and to be informed of the nature
and cause of the accusation;
to be confronted with the witnesses
against him;
to have compulsory process for
obtaining witnesses in his favor,
and to have the Assistance of Counsel
for his defence.

2019 Family Fued Thanksgiving: Republicans vs. Democrats

Thou shalt not discuss politics at the dinner table. This year, 2019, Nancy Pelosi and Adam Schiff have totally and completely destroyed the all American holiday Spirit with
their self-centered three year battle to destroy the Presidency of the United States of America with false accusations and endless and Un-Constitutional probes up the President’s butt. Now, we face a Thanksgiving dinner with Democrat rat relatives throwing hot potatoes while more polite Republican relatives only toss back soft buns.

Daisy dog’s long nose smells something: Are Democrats going to violate Title 18 U.S.C. section 607?

Daisy dog’s long nose smells something:
Are Democrats going to
violate Title 18 U.S.C. section 607?

Have you heard about the Republican Underground
Railroad coffee bar (gossip mill) in Washington, D.C.?
They are whispering……

Must all candidates for President of the United States
of America, who currently hold seats in either the
House or Senate of the United States Congress,
resign immediately today or tomorrow before any
official whole House vote is taken on any type of
Impeachment proceedings which might be seen as an
“in kind” campaign contribution to them to influence
the 2020 Presidential election against the person
they are trying to Impeach: President Donald Trump?

Legal argument against Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard,
simultaneously running for President:

Can a sitting U.S. Representative,
who is simultaneously running for President of the
United States of America, vote for any Impeachment
proceedings if these impeachment proceedings will
possibly result in eliminating an opponent in the
November 3, 2020 General Election for President of
the United States of America? Would this be voting
for any type of “in-kind” campaign contribution,
a contribution of value
that is something other than money?

Case against Senators running for President:
Cory Booker, Amy Klobuchar, Elizabeth Warren,
Bernie Sanders, and Kamala Harris:

If the House votes for any actual Impeachment,
then the case goes to the Senate, if any
U.S. Senator who is simultaneously a candidate
for President, votes to Impeach the current
President who is also simultaneously a candidate
for President within the next year, in the
November 3, 2020 Election, would that vote
against President Trump be an “in-kind” donation,
something of value other than money, to
influence the 2020 Election?

President Bill Clinton was impeached by the House
in his second term. Richard Nixon was impeached
by the House in his second term. Strategists at
the Republican undergroud railroad coffee bar this
morning believe that Nancy Pelosi is going to string
along her impeachment hopes and dreams past the
November 3, 2020 Election and then try to ramp up
the proceedings from “inquiry” to actually proceed
to try to impeach President Trump after he is
re-elected.

Title 18 United States Code section 607
Place of solicitation
(a) Prohibition.
(1) In general. It shall be unlawful for any person
to solicit or receive a donation of money
or other thing of value
in connection with a Federal, State or local election
from a person who is located in a room or building
occupied in the discharge of official duties
by an officer or employee of the United States
It shall be unlawful for an individual who is an
officer or employee of the Federal Government,
including the President, Vice President, and
Members of Congress,
to solicit or receive a donation of money or
other thing of value
in connection with a Federal, State or local election,
while in any room or building occupied in the discharge
of official duties by an officer
or employee of the United States, from any person.

Is that why modern Impeachment proceedings occur
in the President’s second term of Office?

Is it time for AOC, Alexandria Ocasio Cortez,
to file a Motion to Vacate the Chair to remove
Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House, but not
remove her from Congress?

New! Republican Underground Railroad Gossip from the Coffee Bar in Washington, D.C!

Have you heard about the Republican Underground
Railroad coffee bar (gossip mill) in Washington, D.C.?
They are whispering……

Must all candidates for President of the United States
of America, who currently hold seats in either the
House or Senate of the United States Congress,
resign immediately today or tomorrow before any
official whole House vote is taken on any type of
Impeachment proceedings which might be seen as an
“in kind” campaign contribution to them to influence
the 2020 Presidential election against the person
they are trying to Impeach: President Donald Trump?

Legal argument against Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard,
simultaneously running for President:

Can a sitting U.S. Representative,
who is simultaneously running for President of the
United States of America, vote for any Impeachment
proceedings if these impeachment proceedings will
possibly result in eliminating an opponent in the
November 3, 2020 General Election for President of
the United States of America? Would this be voting
for any type of “in-kind” campaign contribution,
a contribution of value
that is something other than money?

Case against Senators running for President:
Cory Booker, Amy Klobuchar, Elizabeth Warren,
Bernie Sanders, and Kamala Harris:

If the House votes for any actual Impeachment,
then the case goes to the Senate, if any
U.S. Senator who is simultaneously a candidate
for President, votes to Impeach the current
President who is also simultaneously a candidate
for President within the next year, in the
November 3, 2020 Election, would that vote
against President Trump be an “in-kind” donation,
something of value other than money, to
influence the 2020 Election?

President Bill Clinton was impeached by the House
in his second term. Richard Nixon was impeached
by the House in his second term. Strategists at
the Republican undergroud railroad coffee bar this
morning believe that Nancy Pelosi is going to string
along her impeachment hopes and dreams past the
November 3, 2020 Election and then try to ramp up
the proceedings from “inquiry” to actually proceed
to try to impeach President Trump after he is
re-elected.

Title 18 United States Code section 607
Place of solicitation
(a) Prohibition.
(1) In general. It shall be unlawful for any person
to solicit or receive a donation of money
or other thing of value
in connection with a Federal, State or local election
from a person who is located in a room or building
occupied in the discharge of official duties
by an officer or employee of the United States
It shall be unlawful for an individual who is an
officer or employee of the Federal Government,
including the President, Vice President, and
Members of Congress,
to solicit or receive a donation of money or
other thing of value
in connection with a Federal, State or local election,
while in any room or building occupied in the discharge
of official duties by an officer
or employee of the United States, from any person.

Is that why modern Impeachment proceedings occur
in the President’s second term of Office?

Is it time for AOC, Alexandria Ocasio Cortez,
to file a Motion to Vacate the Chair to remove
Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House, but not
remove her from Congress?

120 days past since I filed FEC complaint & they have done nothing

The FEC, the Federal Election Commission, has failed to act on my complaint within 120 days of filing, to the best of my information, because I have received no NOTICE in the mail from them since June 2019. The FEC law, passed by the United States Congress, requires “confidentiality” so that a person complaining can not show the world their filed complaint. Sometimes the FEC goes for years and still does nothing about a complaint. Suppose you were a RAPE victim, and you filed a complaint and were then told you had to keep “confidential” your complaint and not tell the world? The FEC laws were passed by and for the advantage of the incumbent elected officials, and foreigners who are
influencing elections. Americans suffer the disadvantage of essentially having their mouths duct taped shut after they
file a complaint because of the “confidentiality” requirements in the laws, in which the tables turn, and YOU become the
“criminal” if you speak up and tell what the bad guys did.
These laws are clearly un-American. http://www.fec.gov
There is no law for withdrawing a complaint, therefore,
you could be required to keep your complaint “confidential”
forever. This is political “rape”.
Ahead of President Trump’s Speech to the National Rifle Association … https://giffords.org/2019/04/giffords-clc-nra-suit/
Apr 24, 2019 … The FEC must bring illegal campaign conduct into the light of day and … the 120-
day period expired in which the FEC was legally required to …

CREW Sues FEC for Failure to Act Against Dark Money Group in … The FEC failed to resolve the original complaint, which was filed more than six years ago, and failed to act on an amended complaint, filed more than 120 days…
https://www.citizensforethics.org/lawsuit/crew-sues-fec-for-failure-to-act-against-dark-money-group-in-over-6-years

Nonprofit sues FEC over campaign finance violations by NRA … Apr 25, 2019
FECA provides administrative complaints with a right of action against the FEC if
the FEC fails to act on a complaint within 120 days.
https://www.jurist.org/news/2019/04/nonprofit-sues-fec-over-campaign-finance-violations-by-nra/

Free Speech For People v. Federal Election Commission | Cohen … Jun 13, 2019
The Federal Election Commission (“FECA”) was enacted to limit … If the FEC fails
to act on an administrative complaint within the 120-day …
https://www.cohenmilstein.com/case-study/free-speech-people-v-federal-election-commission

HEALTHCARE for AMERICANS starts in 2020

HEALTH CARE for ALL AMERICANS STARTS IN 2020

Cris Ericson for US Congress 2020 & Governor of Vermont 2020 Independent Candidate Platform
http://indyvt.com

HEALTH CARE for ALL AMERICANS must
be paid for in several ways:

(A) 2 million homeless American citizens have little chance of securing employment
to pay for health insurance.

Health Care will only cover all Americans if it is NOT
insurance based, but instead, paid for by taxes funding clinics and hospitals and
prescriptions. Corporations should be taxed as persons, because the US Supreme Court claims that a corporation is a person,
and therefore, they should be liable for each and every member of their corporate family which has to include all of their
employees!

(B) We should require all medical schools receiving state and federal funding to
require students work for government run free clinics to pay back the taxpayers for their
investment in the students’ education.

(C) We must demand taxpayers own 50% of the profits for all
prescription drugs for
which taxpayers paid for the research, design and development under the general intent of U.S. Copyright and U.S. Patent Laws whereby the persons paying for R & D (research and development of new products) should own the Patent or Copyright; so in the case of taxpayers paying for research, design and development of new prescription drugs and medical devices, the taxpayers should own the patents and copyrights, or at least 50% of them, because we paid for the R & D; and those profits should be divided among the 50 states to pay for healthcare for all Americans.

The government shouldn’t be handing out taxpayer dollars to profit-making corporations without a return on our investment!

AMERICANS HAVE A RIGHT TO A PROFIT ON OUR TAX DOLLARS
WHEN THE CORPORATIONS THEY ARE GIVEN TO USE THEM TO PROFIT!

Taxpayers pay taxes, then the U.S. Congress votes to give billions of dollars of your
taxes to the N.I.H., National Institute of Health, and then the N.I.H. gives millions and
millions of your tax dollars to the mega-wealthy pharmaceutical companies for research to create new prescription drugs and medical devices.

The pharmaceutical companies claim the ownership of the Patents for all of the drugs and medical devices they invented using your tax dollars to pay for all of their
research, but, under work-made-for-hire Patent Laws, the taxpayers should rightfully
own 50% (50 percent) of the profits of all sales of all of the prescription drugs and
medical devices sold WORLDWIDE FOR TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS
which were invented using taxpayer dollars.

The N.I.H., National Institute of Health, appears to have
co-conspired for years, with
the United States Congress, House & Senate, to deprive taxpayers of their right to
the profits on medical devices that they paid for the research for.

The incumbent U.S. Senators and Representatives to Congress have quietly stood by and profitied from this alleged money laundering scheme
because they get kick-backs in the form of campaign contributions from the PACs,
Political Action Committees, of pharmaceutical companies that received funding from
the N.I.H. which received the funding from the U.S. Congress which took the money
from taxpayers.

Cris Ericson for US Congress 2020 & Governor of Vermont 2020 Independent Candidate Platform
http://indyvt.com

22 October, 2019 20:26

HEALTH CARE for ALL AMERICANS STARTS IN 2020

Cris Ericson for US Congress 2020 & Governor of Vermont 2020 Independent Candidate Platform
http://indyvt.com

HEALTH CARE for ALL AMERICANS must
be paid for in several ways:

(A) 2 million homeless American citizens have little chance of securing employment
to pay for health insurance.

Health Care will only cover all Americans if it is NOT
insurance based, but instead, paid for by taxes funding clinics and hospitals and
prescriptions. Corporations should be taxed as persons, because the US Supreme Court claims that a corporation is a person,
and therefore, they should be liable for each and every member of their corporate family which has to include all of their
employees!

(B) We should require all medical schools receiving state and federal funding to
require students work for government run free clinics to pay back the taxpayers for their
investment in the students’ education.

(C) We must demand taxpayers own 50% of the profits for all
prescription drugs for
which taxpayers paid for the research, design and development under the general intent of U.S. Copyright and U.S. Patent Laws whereby the persons paying for R & D (research and development of new products) should own the Patent or Copyright; so in the case of taxpayers paying for research, design and development of new prescription drugs and medical devices, the taxpayers should own the patents and copyrights, or at least 50% of them, because we paid for the R & D; and those profits should be divided among the 50 states to pay for healthcare for all Americans.

The government shouldn’t be handing out taxpayer dollars to profit-making corporations without a return on our investment!

AMERICANS HAVE A RIGHT TO A PROFIT ON OUR TAX DOLLARS
WHEN THE CORPORATIONS THEY ARE GIVEN TO USE THEM TO PROFIT!

Taxpayers pay taxes, then the U.S. Congress votes to give billions of dollars of your taxes to the N.I.H., National Institute of Health, and then the N.I.H.
gives millions and millions of your tax dollars to the mega-wealthy pharmaceutical companies for research to create new prescription drugs and medical devices.

The pharmaceutical companies claim the ownership of the Patents for all of the drugs and medical devices they invented using your tax dollars to pay for all of their research, but, under work-made-for-hire Patent Laws, the taxpayers
should rightfully own 50% (50 percent) of the profits of all sales of all of the prescription drugs and medical devices sold WORLDWIDE FOR TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS which were invented using taxpayer dollars.

The N.I.H., National Institute of Health, appears to have
co-conspired for years, with the United States Congress, House & Senate, to deprive taxpayers of their right to the profits on medical devices that they paid for the research for.

The incumbent U.S. Senators and Representatives to Congress have quietly stood by and profitied from this alleged money laundering scheme
because they get kick-backs in the form of campaign contributions from the PACs, Political Action Committees, of pharmaceutical companies that received funding from the N.I.H. which received the funding from the U.S. Congress which took the money from taxpayers.

Cris Ericson for US Congress 2020 & Governor of Vermont 2020 Independent Candidate Platform
http://indyvt.com

20 October, 2019 13:55

i checked the box: I am not a Robot, but the evil, facist, totalitarian censor Mark Zuckerberg will not let me back in Facebook. He must get his rocks off harrassing me. MARK ZUCKERBERG must be some kind of pervert to spend so much of his time obsessed with violating me. Enjoying yourself Mark Zuckerberg?