WORLD’S BEST POLITICAL PLATFORM! NEW SOLUTIONS TO TOP 3 ISSUES! VOTE CRIS ERICSON 2020

WORLD’S BEST POLITICAL PLATFORM!
NEW SOLUTIONS TO TOP 3 ISSUES!
VOTE CRIS ERICSON 2020

World’s Best Political Platform: Please Share with all Candidates for President!

WORLD’S BEST POLITICAL PLATFORM
WITH THE TOP 3 NEW SOLUTIONS!
This plan includes
(1) Education
(2) Health Care
(3) Global Warming

(1) EDUCATION? Demand R.O.I for Education!

We must demand a Return on Investment, R.O.I.
of our taxpayer dollars given to Defense Contractors
who use our money to make Trillions of dollars
for themselves, and give us no share of profits in return.
If our taxpayer dollars were spent to buy shares of
stock in these Defense Contractors, we would receive
Quarterly dividend paychecks.

Defense contractors receive our tax dollars because the
U.S. Congress votes to give our tax dollars to the Pentagon
and then the Pentagon gives millions and millions to
Defense Contractors for research, design and development,
R&D of new weapons systems, jets and drones and satellite
systems, and then they apply for the ownership of the
PATENTS, and then they sell these products worldwide
to our Allies for Trillions of dollars in profits.

A PATENT is the ownership certificate of the invention.
In PATENT law there is a concept of “work made for hire”
which means the persons paying for the work have a
right to ownership of the PATENT. We, the taxpayers,
paid for the research, design and development so we
have a right to co-ownership in the PATENT.

Cris Ericson is the only candidate telling you this!
Cris Ericson was born in Washington, D.C., the
daughter of a Patent Attorney who worked in the
U.S. Patent Office.

Because we, the tax payers, paid for the R&D, the research,
design and development of these new weapons systems,
we should OWN part of the PATENTS, and Cris Ericson
will submit a Bill to the U.S. Congress when she is
elected from Vermont 2020, demanding our
share of the profits which will pay for free college.

(2) HEALTH CARE? Demand R.O.I. for Health Care!

We must demand a Return on Investment, R.O.I.
of our taxpayer dollars given out by the N.I.H.
National Institute of Health, which gives the
money out for research to Universities
and pharmaceutical laboratories for research,
design and development, R&D,
on new medical devices and prescription drugs,
and then the Professor or Laboratory applies for
the PATENT, sometimes the University Professor
starts their very own pharmaceutical corporation,
and then these pharmaceutical coporations sell the
new prescriptions and medical devices world wide
making Trillions of dollars in profit, but they
do not give us any share of the profits even
though we, the taxpayers, paid for the research,
design and development, R&D.

If our taxpayer dollars were spent to buy
Shares of Stock in these
Universities whose professors use student labor,
and Pharmaceutical Laboratories,
which then PATENT the medical devices
and prescription drugs invented in their
laboratories, and then sell the PATENTS
to Pharmaceutical Corporations,
we would receive Quarterly dividend paychecks.

A PATENT is the ownership certificate of the invention.
In PATENT law there is a concept of “work made for hire”
which means the persons paying for the work have a
right to ownership of the PATENT. We, the taxpayers,
paid for the research, design and development so we
have a right to co-ownership in the PATENT.

Universities and medical research laboratories
receive our tax dollars because the
U.S. Congress votes to give our tax dollars to the N.I.H,
National Institute of Health,
and then the N.I.H gives millions and millions of dollars to University and pharmaceutical laboratories
for research, design and development,
R&D of new prescription drugs, and medical devices,
and then they apply for the ownership of the
PATENTS, and then they sell these products worldwide
for Trillions of dollars in profits.
Because we, the tax payers, paid for the R&D, the research,
design and development of these new weapons systems,
we should co-OWN part of the PATENTS, and Cris Ericson
will submit a Bill to the U.S. Congress, when she
is elected from Vermont 2020, demanding our
share of the profits which will help pay for
Health Care for all U.S. Citizens.

WHY HAS THE U.S. CONGRESS, HOUSE & SENATE,
NOT DONE ANYTHING TO DEMAND OUR RETURN ON
INVESTMENT OF OUR TAXPAYER DOLLARS?

They have a little money laundering scheme going on.
The Pentagon and the N.I.H. National Institute of
Health were created by the U.S. Congress to
facilitate this money laundering scheme.

The money, our taxpayer dollars, does not go
directly to Defense Contractors, it is sent first
to the Pentagon.

The money, our taxpayer dollars, does not go
directly to Pharmaceutical Corporations, it is
sent first to the National Institute of Health,
the N.I.H.

Then the Pentagon and N.I.H. hand out our money
to defense contractors and laboratories to pay
for their R&D research, design and development
of new medical and defense products.
Then they apply for the PATENTS and then sell the
products worldwide making trillions of dollars.

Then, the defense contractors and pharamceutical
corporations pay the Members of the United States
Congress, House & Senate with campaign donations
from the PACS, political action committees of the
defense contractors and pharmaceutical corporations.
The defense contractors and pharmaceutical
corporations also pay Lobbyists to wine and dine
the Members of the U.S. Congress.

That’s how this money laundring scheme has
quietly gone on for years and years,
with your taxpayer dollars being sent, by a VOTE
of the U.S. Congress to the Pentagon and N.I.H.,
and from there to defense contractors and
pharmaceutical corporations, and from there to
PACs, poliical action committees and Lobbyists,
and from there some of your taxpayer dollars are
deposited into the campaign war chests of the
Members of the U.S. Congress, House and Senate.

IT IS TIME TO STOP THIS MONEY LAUNDERING SCHEME!

(3) CLIMATE CHANGE & GLOBAL WARMING

Foreign countries use canals to re-route water to
keep areas from flooding.
Look at satellite images
of the Netherlands,
look at photos of Venice, Italy.
We can do this!

To get started, the U.S. Army Corps. of Engineers
can dig a canal following all along Interstate
Highway 10 all the way from Florida to California.
They must dig it wide enough and deep enough
to accomodate mating and breeding ocean whales.
This will create thousands of miles of new fishing
areas and new jobs fish farming lobsters and
cod and haddock and sea salmon, etc. Delicious!

Then, the overflow of salt water which will occur
during periods of global warming will be irrigated
into desalinization plants to create fresh water
which will be directed into irrigation ditches
for new farming areas and new jobs farming in
the deserts of Texas, New Mexico, Arizon and
southern California.

We are going to make lemonade from lemons.
Climate change and global warming will be
used to create new jobs in fishing
and farming, and a new whale route from
the Atlantic Ocean to the Pacific Ocean
in a deep and wide canal all along
Interstate highway 10 from Florida to
California.

IF YOU AGREE WITH THESE POLITICAL ISSUES,
PLEASE HURRY AND HELP NOW!
THE VOTERS NEED TO HEAR THESE
IDEAS NOW!

Please send donation checks to:
Campaign to Elect Cris Ericson 2020
879 Church Street
Chester, Vermonnt 05143-9375
(802)875-4038

http://www.politics2020.org
Cris Ericson for U.S. Congress 2020
from Vermont
http://crisericson.com
1-802-289-1000 text messages only, please.
No data downloads.

WORLD’S BEST 2020 POLITICAL PLATFORM! VOTE CRIS ERICSON 2020 for US CONGRESS

WORLD’S BEST 2020 POLITICAL PLATFORM!
VOTE CRIS ERICSON 2020 for US CONGRESS

Please send a donation check right away to
Campaign to Elect Cris Ericson
if you agree with this political platform.
We need to get our message out
and share it everywhere!
Campaign to Elect Cris Ericson,
879 Church St., Chester, VT 05143 (802)875-4038

WORLD’S BEST POLITICAL PLATFORM

(1) COLLEGE EDUCATION? R.O.I. for College!

We must demand a Return on Investment, R.O.I.
of our taxpayer dollars given to Defense Contractors
who use our money to make Trillions of dollars
for themselves, and give us no share of profits in return.
If our taxpayer dollars were spent to buy shares of
stock in these Defense Contractors, we would receive
Quarterly dividend paychecks.

Defense contractors receive our tax dollars because the
U.S. Congress votes to give our tax dollars to the Pentagon
and then the Pentagon gives millions and millions to
Defense Contractors for research, design and development,
R&D of new weapons systems, jets and drones and satellite
systems, and then they apply for the ownership of the
PATENTS, and then they sell these products worldwide
to our Allies for Trillions of dollars in profits.

A PATENT is the ownership certificate of the invention.
In PATENT law there is a concept of “work made for hire”
which means the persons paying for the work have a
right to ownership of the PATENT. We, the taxpayers,
paid for the research, design and development so we
have a right to co-ownership in the PATENT.

Cris Ericson was born in Washington, D.C., the
daughter of a Patent Attorney who worked in the
U.S. Patent Office.

Because we, the tax payers, paid for the R&D, the research,
design and development of these new weapons systems,
we should OWN part of the PATENTS, and Cris Ericson
will submit a Bill to the U.S. Congress when she is
elected from Vermont 2020, demanding our
share of the profits which will pay for free college.

(2) HEALTH CARE? R.O.I. for Health Care!

We must demand a Return on Investment, R.O.I.
of our taxpayer dollars given out by the N.I.H.
National Institute of Health, which gives the
money out for research to Universities
and pharmaceutical laboratories for research,
design and development, R&D,
on new medical devices and prescription drugs,
and then the Professor or Laboratory applies for
the PATENT, sometimes the University Professor
starts their very own pharmaceutical corporation,
and then these pharmaceutical coporations sell the
new prescriptions and medical devices world wide
making Trillions of dollars in profit, but they
do not give us any share of the profits even
though we, the taxpayers, paid for the research,
design and development, R&D.

If our taxpayer dollars were spent to buy
Shares of Stock in these
Universities whose professors use student labor,
and Pharmaceutical Laboratories,
which then PATENT the medical devices
and prescription drugs invented in their
laboratories, and then sell the PATENTS
to Pharmaceutical Corporations,
we would receive Quarterly dividend paychecks.

A PATENT is the ownership certificate of the invention.
In PATENT law there is a concept of “work made for hire”
which means the persons paying for the work have a
right to ownership of the PATENT. We, the taxpayers,
paid for the research, design and development so we
have a right to co-ownership in the PATENT.

Universities and medical research laboratories
receive our tax dollars because the
U.S. Congress votes to give our tax dollars to the N.I.H,
National Institute of Health,
and then the N.I.H gives millions and millions of dollars to University and pharmaceutical laboratories
for research, design and development,
R&D of new prescription drugs, and medical devices,
and then they apply for the ownership of the
PATENTS, and then they sell these products worldwide
for Trillions of dollars in profits.
Because we, the tax payers, paid for the R&D, the research,
design and development of these new weapons systems,
we should co-OWN part of the PATENTS, and Cris Ericson
will submit a Bill to the U.S. Congress, when she
is elected from Vermont 2020, demanding our
share of the profits which will help pay for
Health Care for all U.S. Citizens.

WHY HAS THE U.S. CONGRESS, HOUSE & SENATE,
NOT DONE ANYTHING TO DEMAND OUR RETURN ON
INVESTMENT OF OUR TAXPAYER DOLLARS?

They have a little money laundering scheme going on.
The Pentagon and the N.I.H. National Institute of
Health were created by the U.S. Congress to
facilitate this money laundering scheme.

The money, our taxpayer dollars, does not go
directly to Defense Contractors, it is sent first
to the Pentagon.

The money, our taxpayer dollars, does not go
directly to Pharmaceutical Corporations, it is
sent first to the National Institute of Health,
the N.I.H.

Then the Pentagon and N.I.H. hand out our money
to defense contractors and laboratories.
They apply for the PATENTS and then sell
products worldwide making trillions of dollars.

Then, the defense contractors and pharamceutical
corporations pay the Members of the United States
Congress, House & Senate with campaign donations
from the PACS, political action committees of the
defense contractors and pharmaceutical corporations.
The defense contractors and pharmaceutical
corporations also pay Lobbyists to wine and dine
the Members of the U.S. Congress.

That’s how this money laundring scheme has
quietly gone on for years and years,
with your taxpayer dollars being sent, by a VOTE
of the U.S. Congress to the Pentagon and N.I.H.,
and from there to defense contractors and
pharmaceutical corporations, and from there to
PACs, poliical action committees and Lobbyists,
and from there some of your taxpayer dollars are
deposited into the campaign war chests of the
Members of the U.S. Congress, House and Senate.

IT IS TIME TO STOP THIS MONEY LAUNDERING SCHEME!

Cris Ericson 2020
http://politics2020.org
http://crisericson.com

CAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES WHO ARE EXCLUDED FROM DEBATES JOIN A LEGAL ACTION W/ AN INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE?

CAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES WHO ARE EXCLUDED FROM DEBATES JOIN A LEGAL ACTION W/ AN INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE?

HAS YOUR FAVORITE DEMOCRATIC PARTY CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT
OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEEN EXCLUDED FROM THE
JANUARY 2020 POLITICAL DEBATE? WHAT CAN BE DONE ABOUT IT?

WILL THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY EVER BE ENTIRELY INCLUSIVE AND FAIR?

Could Democratic Party candidates for President of the United States of America, who have been excluded from debates jointly controlled by PBS, join the complaint of an independent candidate for U.S. Congress against Vermont PBS?

HAPPY NEW YEAR!
WILL 2020 BRING FAIRNESS TO POLITICS?

I want all Democratic Party candidates for President of the
United States of America to sit up and pay attention because you know that PBS is constantly asking for viewer donations, and you know that PBS most likely contributes to the
manipulation of the
criteria for debate participation, so ask yourselves,
how many of their donations are from foreigners, and
how much influence do the foreigners have in the manipulation of criteria for debate participation?

Isn’t that foreign influence in our elections if
that is what is going on, even if it is a small part?Cris Ericson filed her complaint to the Federal Election Commission
last summer 2019 before the Republican Commissioner resigned, leaving the FEC without the necessary Quorum of four Commissioners required to vote to send a complaint to the U.S. Attorney General or to vote to dismiss a complaint or to vote to take action on a complaint.

The FEC has 120 days to take action on a complaint,
and if they do not do it within that time frame,
then the party complaining can take legal action
in the United States District Court in
Washington, D.C. if they want to. Otherwise, they
sit and wait for the Federal Election Commission
to take action one way or another.

The file cabinets at the FEC might be full of
complaints asking questions about
foreign influence in elections,
but they might not be heard right now
because there is no Quorum of four Commissioners
to vote on the complaints that might exist or
to vote to send them to the U.S. Attorney General.
Isn’t it important right now to get any questions
about foreign influence in elections out for the
public to hear?

Cris Ericson’s complaint
has been sitting at the Federal Election Commission
since last summer, well over 120 days, but
she can not afford to take her complaint to the
United States District Court in Washington, D.C.
and the only way it could get there would be if
other candidates for Federal Office “join”
her complaint by filing with her to the
United States District Court in Washington, D.C.
with a pro-bono attorney representing them.

Cris Ericson filed her complaint to the Federal Election Commission last summer 2019 before the Republican Commissioner resigned, leaving the FEC without the necessary Quorum of four Commissioners required to vote to send a complaint to the U.S. Attorney General or to vote to dismiss a complaint or to vote to take action on a complaint.

When a complaint has just been sitting in some file
drawer at the FEC for over 120 days, then the person complaining has a legal right to re-file the complaint with the
United States District Court in Washington, D.C.
where other candidates for federal office
could “join” the complaint.

How many Democratic Party candidates for
President of the United States of America
are now complaining about being excluded
from political candidate debates which are
partly funded by PBS, which receives federal
tax dollars, and therefore should not

exclude any candidate from debates?
http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/top-democratic-candidates-ask-dnc-change-debate-qualifying-rules

Could Democratic Party candidates for President of the United States, who are being excluded from political candidate debates by PBS, join a Vermont independent candidate who filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission against Vermont PBS for excluding her from 2018 political candidate debates even though she was on the official election ballot for the general election Nov. 6, 2018 in Vermont?

Isn’t the issue the same for all excluded candidates, that PBS is funded by tax dollars and therefore no candidate with ballot status, whether it is the primary election or the general election, should be excluded from any debates which are funded by PBS which is funded by taxpayer dollars?

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/top-democratic-candidates-ask-dnc-change-debate-qualifying-rules

Democratic Presidential candidates are complaining about debate exclusion by PBS News Hour & Politico.

What can be done?

Maybe they could “join” Cris Ericson’s complaint to the Federal Election Commission, which has not been resolved yet.
Matter Under Review, M.U.R. #7619

Cris Ericson was excluded from Vermont PBS
candidate debates in 2018 even though she was on the Nov. 6, 2018 Official Election Ballot in Vermont for United States Congress House of Representatives (and for Governor of Vermont as allowed by Vermont laws).

PBS is involved in all of these candidate complaints of debate exclusion for federal office, so even though Cris Ericson
is an independent candidate,
maybe they should all join Cris Ericson’s complaint!

The FEC is like a secret court
and the public can not know the outcome of the complaint
until it is settled. When the complaint is settled,
the public can search the outcome by searching
“closed enforcement matters” and entering
the “Matter Under Review” number: M.U.R. #7619

Confidentiality
http://www.fec.gov/legal-resources/enforcement/complaints-process/how-to-file-complaint-with-fec/

To protect the interests of those involved in a complaint,
the law requires that any Commission action on a MUR
be kept strictly confidential until the case is resolved.
These provisions do not, however, prevent a complainant or respondent from disclosing the substance of the complaint itself
or the response to that complaint
or from engaging in conduct that leads to the publication
of information contained in the complaint.
Nevertheless, information about a Commission notification of findings or about a Commission investigation may not be disclosed,
unless the respondent waives his or her right to confidentiality in writing. Because the public has the right to know the outcome of any
enforcement proceeding,
a redacted case file is made available to the public in the Press Office and Office of Public Records within 30 days after the parties involved have been notified that the entire case has been closed. Closed case files are also available for review on the Commission’s website.

Federal Election Commission | United States of America

The Federal Election Commission administers and enforces the laws that govern the financing of elections for federal office—the U.S. House, Senate and President.
Other election-related laws are not within the FEC’s jurisdiction. Any person may file a complaint with the Commission
if he or she believes a violation of the federal election campaign lawsommission finds that a violation occurred,
possible outcomes can range from a letter reiterating compliance obligations to a conciliation agreement, which may include a monetary civil penalty. All FEC enforcement matters are kept confidential until they are resolved.

http://www.fec.gov/legal-resources/enforcement/complaints-process/how-to-file-complaint-with-fec/

Office of General Counsel
Federal Election Commission
1050 First Street, NE
Washington, DC 20463

http://www.fec.gov/legal-resources/enforcement/complaints-process/how-to-file-complaint-with-fec/

In order for the complaint to be considered complete and proper, it should clearly recite the facts
that show specific violations under the Commission’s jurisdiction and clearly identify each person,
committee, group, or entity that is alleged to have committed a violation (the “respondent”).
Citations to the law and regulations are not required, but the complaint should include any
documentation supporting the allegations and differentiate between statements based
on the complainant’s personal knowledge and those based on information and belief.
Statements not based on personal knowledge should identify the source of the information.

Cris Ericson http://politics2020.org

FEC COMPLAINT: VERMONT PBS EXCLUDED CRIS ERICSON from 2018 DEBATES

FEC COMPLAINT: VERMONT PBS EXCLUDED CRIS ERICSON from 2018 DEBATES! Cris Ericson is now an independent candidate in Vermont for U.S. Congress 2020. Some 2020 Democratic Party candidates for President of the United States are now complaining about being excluded from debates.
What right does publicly funded PBS have to exclude ANY candidate? PBS is funded with public tax dollars!
What right do they have to exclude anyone?

Cris Ericson complained to the Federal Election Commission
that Vermont PBS excluded her from candidate debates in 2018 even though she was on the Nov. 6, 2018 official Election Ballot. The FEC is like a secret court
and the public can not know the outcome of the complaint
until it is settled. When the complaint is settled,
the public can search the outcome by searching
“closed enforcement matters” and entering
the “Matter Under Review” number: M.U.R. #7619

Confidentiality
http://www.fec.gov/legal-resources/enforcement/complaints-process/how-to-file-complaint-with-fec/ To protect the interests of those involved in a complaint,
the law requires that any Commission action on a MUR
be kept strictly confidential until the case is resolved.
These provisions do not, however, prevent a complainant or respondent from disclosing the substance of the complaint itself
or the response to that complaint
or from engaging in conduct that leads to the publication
of information contained in the complaint.
Nevertheless, information about a Commission notification of findings or about a Commission investigation may not be disclosed,
unless the respondent waives his or her right to confidentiality in writing.

Because the public has the right to know the outcome of any
enforcement proceeding,
a redacted case file is made available to the public in the Press Office and Office of Public Records within 30 days after the parties involved have been notified that the entire case has been closed.
Closed case files are also available for review on the Commission’s website.

Federal Election Commission | United States of America
The Federal Election Commission administers and enforces the laws that govern the financing of elections for federal office—the U.S. House, Senate and President.
Other election-related laws are not within the FEC’s jurisdiction. Any person may file a complaint with the Commission
if he or she believes a violation of the federal election campaign laws or FEC regulations has occurred or is about to occur.
The Commission reviews every complaint filed.
If the Commission finds that a violation occurred,
possible outcomes can range from a letter reiterating compliance obligations to a conciliation agreement, which may include a monetary civil penalty. All FEC enforcement matters are kept confidential until they are resolved.

http://www.fec.gov/legal-resources/enforcement/complaints-process/how-to-file-complaint-with-fec/ Office of General Counsel
Federal Election Commission
1050 First Street, NE
Washington, DC 20463

http://www.fec.gov/legal-resources/enforcement/complaints-process/how-to-file-complaint-with-fec/ In order for the complaint to be considered complete and proper, it should clearly recite the facts
that show specific violations under the Commission’s jurisdiction and clearly identify each person,
committee, group, or entity that is alleged to have committed a violation (the “respondent”).
Citations to the law and regulations are not required, but the complaint should include any documentation supporting the allegations and differentiate between statements based on the complainant’s personal knowledge and those based on information and belief. Statements not based on personal knowledge should identify the source of the information.

19 December, 2019 09:54

Nancy Pelosi was raised in Baltimore, Maryland by her “Mafia” leader father. Democrats spewed the equivalent of telemarketing pitches w/ chorus “no one is above the (Mafia) law”. UPCOMING US Senate trial & F.I.S.A. Warrant scandal will lock them up for blatant violations of US Constitution (ours, not the fake mafia version).

Why are Democrats in error on impeachment?

Why are Democrats in error on impeachment?
(1) The President is Commander in Chief of the U.S. Military and it is 100% up to him to decide if Ukraine is safe to give money to buy weapons, or weapons to,
because at any time they could change their minds and turn those weapons against us.
(2) The US Congress is not in charge of the President so when he claims Executive Privilege to which they do not agree, their only recourse is the US Supreme Court.

FACEBOOK CENSORS CRIS ERICSON AGAIN ON NOV. 17, 2019

NOVEMBER 17, 2019 FACEBOOK, OWNED BY FACIST
TOTALITARIAN DICTATOR MARK ZUCKERBERG,
HAS ACCUSED ME OF VIOLATING THEIR COMMUNITY
STANDARDS WITH THIS MESSAGE –

“We must DEMAND that all of our elected
US Senators and US Congressmen/women
have EQUAL RIGHTS TO FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION
TO JOIN ANY COMMITTEE THEY WANT TO JOIN,
AND TO ENTER ANY HEARING ROOM THEY WANT TO
ENTER, AND FREEDOM OF SPEECH TO HAVE AN
EQUAL TURN TO TALK ABOUT A SUBJECT.

THAT’S THE BOTTOM LINE!
Elected members of the US Congress should have
equal rights, the same as each other,
because if they don’t have equal rights
the same as each other, then
the people back in the States they represent
do NOT have equal representation!”

Cris Ericson

15 November, 2019 12:21

Democratic Party Speaker of the U.S.House of
Representatives, Nancy Pelosi, and
Democratic Party U.S. Congressman Adam Schiff,
swore Oaths of Office
to uphold the United States Constitution;
but then they enacted Rules of the House
which are in violation of the U.S. Constitution
because these Rules deny the Republicans
their rights to Freedom of Association to
enter secret behind-closed-door Hearings
held by Democrats, and these Rules deny
Republicans Freedom of Speech
to ask Witnesses questions of their choice,
and Republicans are denied the Freedom of
Speech to ask Witnesses questions for
the same amount of time the Democrats are allowed
during the Impeachment Inquiry.

We must stop the Impeachment inquiry
immediately and demand a “continuance” until
the UnConstitutional rules of the House
are repealed!

15 November, 2019 10:26

Nancy Pelosi & Adam Schiff swore an Oath to uphold the US Constitution, then they violated their Oaths by making Rules of the House & Impeachment Inquiry which violate the US Constitutional rights of Republicans to Freedom of Association to participate in secret Democrat Hearings & Freedom of Speech to ask questions of Witnesses & have equal time.

11 November, 2019 15:53

Over & over & over again facebook harrasses me asking me to fill in an invisible code I can not see & this is the way they are censoring me now & not allowing me to post a comment on a news story. Mark Zuckerburg is an evil facist totalian cyber world government dictator.

FACEBOOK IS CENSORING ME! REPORT THIS TO THE WHITE HOUSE!

Facebook is repeatedly censoring my comment. PLEASE ALERT WHITE HOUSE TO THIS FACIST, TOTALITARIAN CENSORSHIP BY CYBER DICTATOR MARK ZUCKERBURG!

FACEBOOK REMOVED THIS COMMENT OF MINE.
FACEBOOK NOTIFIES ME: “IF YOU THINK THIS
DOESN’T GO AGAINST OUR COMMUNITY STANDARDS
LET US KNOW”
I let them know, but they refuse to respond,
and continue to remove this comment when
I re-post it.
HOW DOES THIS VIOLATE FACIST, DICTATOR,
TOTALITARIAN MARK ZUCKERBERG’S STANDARDS?

CRIS ERICSON
“R.O.I. return on investment, for every taxpayer dollar the U.S. Congress votes to give the N.I.H. and Pentagon, they turn around and disperse those funds for medical and defense research, and the pharmaceutical and defense industry co.s make huge profits, but WE paid for the R&D, the research, design and development of new prescription drugs and jets and defense products, so when they are sold worldwide, WE should receive a share of the profits, R.O.I. return on investment, like stock dividends.”

Please notify the White House that facebook
is a totalitarian, facist, world wide cyber
dictatorship and Mark Zuckerburg is the
number one enemy of Democracy and free speech.

President Trump has 6th Amendment rights! Demand the US Constitution be upheld!

President Trump has 6th Amendment rights like all of us!
Demand his US Constitutional rights be upheld!

Many people in criminal courts these days are
deprived of their 6th Amendment rights,
and if everyone knew what really goes on,
they would be shocked and horrified the
way people like Adam Schiff and Nancy Pelosi
are working to destroy the U.S. Constitution!

Constitution of the United States
6th Amendment
In all criminal prosecutions,
the accused shall enjoy the right
to a speedy
and public trial,
by an impartial jury
of the State and district wherein
the crime shall have been committed,
which district shall have been
previously ascertained by law,
and to be informed of the nature
and cause of the accusation;
to be confronted with the witnesses
against him;
to have compulsory process for
obtaining witnesses in his favor,
and to have the Assistance of Counsel
for his defence.

2019 Family Fued Thanksgiving: Republicans vs. Democrats

Thou shalt not discuss politics at the dinner table. This year, 2019, Nancy Pelosi and Adam Schiff have totally and completely destroyed the all American holiday Spirit with
their self-centered three year battle to destroy the Presidency of the United States of America with false accusations and endless and Un-Constitutional probes up the President’s butt. Now, we face a Thanksgiving dinner with Democrat rat relatives throwing hot potatoes while more polite Republican relatives only toss back soft buns.

Daisy dog’s long nose smells something: Are Democrats going to violate Title 18 U.S.C. section 607?

Daisy dog’s long nose smells something:
Are Democrats going to
violate Title 18 U.S.C. section 607?

Have you heard about the Republican Underground
Railroad coffee bar (gossip mill) in Washington, D.C.?
They are whispering……

Must all candidates for President of the United States
of America, who currently hold seats in either the
House or Senate of the United States Congress,
resign immediately today or tomorrow before any
official whole House vote is taken on any type of
Impeachment proceedings which might be seen as an
“in kind” campaign contribution to them to influence
the 2020 Presidential election against the person
they are trying to Impeach: President Donald Trump?

Legal argument against Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard,
simultaneously running for President:

Can a sitting U.S. Representative,
who is simultaneously running for President of the
United States of America, vote for any Impeachment
proceedings if these impeachment proceedings will
possibly result in eliminating an opponent in the
November 3, 2020 General Election for President of
the United States of America? Would this be voting
for any type of “in-kind” campaign contribution,
a contribution of value
that is something other than money?

Case against Senators running for President:
Cory Booker, Amy Klobuchar, Elizabeth Warren,
Bernie Sanders, and Kamala Harris:

If the House votes for any actual Impeachment,
then the case goes to the Senate, if any
U.S. Senator who is simultaneously a candidate
for President, votes to Impeach the current
President who is also simultaneously a candidate
for President within the next year, in the
November 3, 2020 Election, would that vote
against President Trump be an “in-kind” donation,
something of value other than money, to
influence the 2020 Election?

President Bill Clinton was impeached by the House
in his second term. Richard Nixon was impeached
by the House in his second term. Strategists at
the Republican undergroud railroad coffee bar this
morning believe that Nancy Pelosi is going to string
along her impeachment hopes and dreams past the
November 3, 2020 Election and then try to ramp up
the proceedings from “inquiry” to actually proceed
to try to impeach President Trump after he is
re-elected.

Title 18 United States Code section 607
Place of solicitation
(a) Prohibition.
(1) In general. It shall be unlawful for any person
to solicit or receive a donation of money
or other thing of value
in connection with a Federal, State or local election
from a person who is located in a room or building
occupied in the discharge of official duties
by an officer or employee of the United States
It shall be unlawful for an individual who is an
officer or employee of the Federal Government,
including the President, Vice President, and
Members of Congress,
to solicit or receive a donation of money or
other thing of value
in connection with a Federal, State or local election,
while in any room or building occupied in the discharge
of official duties by an officer
or employee of the United States, from any person.

Is that why modern Impeachment proceedings occur
in the President’s second term of Office?

Is it time for AOC, Alexandria Ocasio Cortez,
to file a Motion to Vacate the Chair to remove
Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House, but not
remove her from Congress?

New! Republican Underground Railroad Gossip from the Coffee Bar in Washington, D.C!

Have you heard about the Republican Underground
Railroad coffee bar (gossip mill) in Washington, D.C.?
They are whispering……

Must all candidates for President of the United States
of America, who currently hold seats in either the
House or Senate of the United States Congress,
resign immediately today or tomorrow before any
official whole House vote is taken on any type of
Impeachment proceedings which might be seen as an
“in kind” campaign contribution to them to influence
the 2020 Presidential election against the person
they are trying to Impeach: President Donald Trump?

Legal argument against Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard,
simultaneously running for President:

Can a sitting U.S. Representative,
who is simultaneously running for President of the
United States of America, vote for any Impeachment
proceedings if these impeachment proceedings will
possibly result in eliminating an opponent in the
November 3, 2020 General Election for President of
the United States of America? Would this be voting
for any type of “in-kind” campaign contribution,
a contribution of value
that is something other than money?

Case against Senators running for President:
Cory Booker, Amy Klobuchar, Elizabeth Warren,
Bernie Sanders, and Kamala Harris:

If the House votes for any actual Impeachment,
then the case goes to the Senate, if any
U.S. Senator who is simultaneously a candidate
for President, votes to Impeach the current
President who is also simultaneously a candidate
for President within the next year, in the
November 3, 2020 Election, would that vote
against President Trump be an “in-kind” donation,
something of value other than money, to
influence the 2020 Election?

President Bill Clinton was impeached by the House
in his second term. Richard Nixon was impeached
by the House in his second term. Strategists at
the Republican undergroud railroad coffee bar this
morning believe that Nancy Pelosi is going to string
along her impeachment hopes and dreams past the
November 3, 2020 Election and then try to ramp up
the proceedings from “inquiry” to actually proceed
to try to impeach President Trump after he is
re-elected.

Title 18 United States Code section 607
Place of solicitation
(a) Prohibition.
(1) In general. It shall be unlawful for any person
to solicit or receive a donation of money
or other thing of value
in connection with a Federal, State or local election
from a person who is located in a room or building
occupied in the discharge of official duties
by an officer or employee of the United States
It shall be unlawful for an individual who is an
officer or employee of the Federal Government,
including the President, Vice President, and
Members of Congress,
to solicit or receive a donation of money or
other thing of value
in connection with a Federal, State or local election,
while in any room or building occupied in the discharge
of official duties by an officer
or employee of the United States, from any person.

Is that why modern Impeachment proceedings occur
in the President’s second term of Office?

Is it time for AOC, Alexandria Ocasio Cortez,
to file a Motion to Vacate the Chair to remove
Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House, but not
remove her from Congress?